Best Nikon 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G ED IF Autofocus VR Nikkor Zoom Lens Price Review ComparisonNotice of Nikon 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G ED IF Autofocus VR Nikkor Zoom Lens low-priced and recommended by customers. See their story. Don't buy anything before you have read these reviews! |
||
« Back ![]() Nikon 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G ED IF Autofocus VR Nikkor Zoom LensBest Price: $0.00 » » » Buy @ Amazon.com For Best Pricing « « «
Product Features
Editorial Reviews Product Description Nikon is a precision optical company with worldwide manufacturing, research and marketing capabilities. The Nikon name is equated with extraordinary photographic performance, innovation, precision and optical quality.PRODUCT FEATURES:Nikon D-Type design provides precise distance information for flash and ambient light exposure processes;Internal Focus (IF) design for smoother focusing and great body balance;2 Aspherical lens element for low distortion;G Type DX Nikkor is designed exclusively for use with Nikon SLR models where aperture is controlled from body;2 Extra-Low Dispersion (ED) glass elements for minimized chromatic aberration;Exclusive Silent Wave Motor enables ultra-high-speed autofocusing with exceptional accuracy and powerful super-quiet operation;New cosmetic design;VR operation offers the equivalent of using a shutter speed 3 stops faster at 120mm;Rounded diaphragm to make out-of-focus elements appear more natural;First Nikon wide-angle zoom lens with Vibration Reduction (VR);Compact and lightweight. Product Accessories
Similar Products
Customer Reviews RonAnnArbor Said: Much Disparaged lens has Sample Variation -- Good Lens = Great shots ( Nov. 18th 2009 )This is a much disparaged lens by many on the Nikon Forums...but I am not sure how many of those complainers took the time to exchange their lens for a better one. There appears to be a tremendous amount of sample variation for this lens. It took me three lenses until I found one that is tack sharp -- And WOW!....On my D700, I use it for almost all my shots now -- and I've tried all the other "pro" lenses in this focal range as well, NIkon and 3rd Party. I'm find the lens has great range for walk-around purposes and for event shoots. It renders colors brilliantly, and it is sharp with very little putzing around needed with your settings. Half of the shots at my website at RonAnnArbor at [...] in the D700 gallery are taken with the 24-120. I will bet you can't tell which were taken with it, and which were taken with the Nikon 24-70. I would highly recommend this lens -- but I would also add the caveat that you have to be persistent. If you get a lens and it is soft - exchange for a new one, and try again. You will eventually find a really sharp lens that you will be very happy with. I am very happy with mine, even though I was also one of the original disparagers of the lens at first!....Nick Said: Sharp and versatile ( Sep. 3rd 2009 )This lens came with my D700 kit. For the longest time, I did not have a term for comparison. I finally acquired a Nikon 80-200 2.8 (push-pull), which is supposedly much sharper than this lens (in the overlapping focal range). Surprise - it isn't! Even when pixel peeping, I could not see the difference in sharpness when shooting at the respective lens optimal aperture. Now, this lens is NOT as sharp as a prime (compared with a 50mm 1.8), but neither is the more expensive 24-70mm 2.8. Pros: - Good image quality for a 5x zoom. - Reasonably wide on FX - it was definitely an eye opener after the 18mm typical wide end of most DX midrange zooms. - good build quality for the money (except for the butterfly hood thread). I'd say this is solidly in the 'middle' class of the Nikon lens universe - in between the likes of 18-55, 55-200 DX on the low end and the fast zooms on the high end. - VR works like a charm. - relatively light for the focal range covered - AF is fast and silent. - Front element does not rotate - good for polarizing filters. Cons: - Visible distortion at the wide end. - Won't replace wide angle and normal primes in terms of sharpness, but this is the compromise you make for flexibility. - Slowish lens, but that's to be expected for the size / price. My only regret is that I didn't buy this second hand - you can find them for around $300 on craigs or ebay - from people dumping them for no good reason. If you have one, I'd recommend holding on to it, it will improve its resale value once Nikon stops offering this as a kit lens.R. Lanthier Said: Good for what it is intended... ( Aug. 10th 2009 )I was wary of this lens given the very strong negative reputation it had among DX and FX Nikon shooters. For the FX shooter, there just isn't a very compelling Nikon-made modern walk-around lens solution and the 24-120VR hits all the requirements: wide to tele focal length; stabilization; light; quick and quiet autofocus. Now, this lens is not fast and it gets slow rather quickly in the zoom range, but I have found the lens to be an excellent party lens, hiking lens, or general vacation lens. While I absolutely love my 24-70, it does get heavy, and at times you want that extra reach. I find the lens adequately sharp, and produces images with good color and contrast as well. Some have thought that this lens actually works better on FX sensors than DX ones (why this would be the case is not clear). Others have argues that with the release of the D700 Nikon tweaked the optics a bit so it performs better. So my advice is that if you are shooting FX and looking for that walkaround/ vacation/party lens, then give this a try. But do be aware of its limitations and don't expect image quality you'd get from the Nikon zoom Trinity (14-24, 24-70, & 70-200) Is it the best? No! Is it as bad as its reputation? NO!!! Enjoy.J. Haynes Said: Best of Two Worlds ( Jun. 2nd 2009 )Nikon 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G ED IF Autofocus VR Nikkor Zoom Lens Since my photographic interest cover a verity of different genres' I was looking for a high quality lens that could accommodate my varied requirements providing wide angle, candied and personal one on one casual photos. Since my purchase I have had the opportunity to test this lens extensively and am delighted with the results. I have used it to take over 400 photographs ranging from landscapes at Yosemite and the Monterey coast to candied private gatherings and even shot a couple of advertizing layouts for one of my web sites. All in all I am pleased to say the lens lived up to and in some cases exceeded all my expectations. This lens, at around $700 +/-, is not cheap but in my opinion it provides great value when compared to the other candidates hanging in the rather pricy $2000 neighborhood. I should add however if your needs are more casual and you are using one of the excellent DX series (D80 to 300) Nikons there is another Nikkor lens at about half the price. It is the 18-135mm which I have also used extensively with very good results. For whatever it is worth, I would highly recommend both lenses depending on your needs and your budget.Robert E. Stoffer Said: Review Nikon 24-120mm lens with AutoFocus and VR ( May. 20th 2009 )I purchased this lens for the vibration reduction. My D80 came with the same lens without VR and I take a lot of pictures where flash is not allowed. This lens fills the bill perfectly.« Back |
||